9-boxes
As a CTO (Chief Technology Officer), the 9-Box Model can be a powerful tool for assessing and managing your technical team, ensuring you have the right talent to drive innovation, stability, and long-term growth. Here's how to apply it from a technology leadership perspective.
Use the interactive tool below to map out your team members, track talent distribution, and read custom leadership recommendations.
Loading 9-Box Interactive Tool...
How the 9-Box Model Works
The model evaluates employees across two dimensions:
- Performance – Measures an employee’s current contributions, achievements, and results.
- Potential – Assesses an employee’s ability to grow into future leadership roles or take on more responsibility.
Each employee is placed into one of the nine boxes, categorised as follows:
| Low Potential | Medium Potential | High Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Performance | High Performer (Valued contributor, limited growth) | Strong Performer (Develop for leadership) | Top Talent (Ready for promotion / Star) |
| Medium Performance | Skilled but Stagnant (Needs motivation / training) | Core Employee (Stable and reliable) | Emerging Leader (Needs support to grow) |
| Low Performance | Low Performer (May not be a good fit) | Underperformer (Needs PIP / improvement) | Inconsistent Talent (High potential, low execution) |
Talent Assessment Workflow
Here is how you should structure the review cycle when applying this model to your engineering organisation:
Strategic Action Plans
- Identify high-potential employees: Those in the top-right boxes should be nurtured for leadership, architect roles, or cross-cutting principal positions.
- Provide targeted development: Employees in the centre and growth categories should receive explicit skill-building opportunities, rotation programs, and architectural mentorship.
- Address performance issues: Those in the caution and risk rows may need immediate, structured support. Start by identifying if it is an execution gap (skill) or motivation gap (will).
Explore Next
- Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) — Structured pathways for managing underperformance.
- Peter Principle — Understanding the risk of promoting engineers into roles beyond their potential.
- Career Ladders — Aligning talent evaluations with formal level expectations.